Compare CLP Hub with global insurance platforms

A modern alternative to heavy enterprise systems — faster to launch, easier to adapt, built for Tier-2/3 insurers and digital ecosystems.

Top Table — Summary

Criteria
Implementation time
Cost model
Localization
Modularity
Flexibility
Team required
Global Vendors
12–36 months
CAPEX + large integration budgets
Long, expensive, often custom
Heavy architecture
Limited without integrators
Large internal IT
CLP Hub
2–4 months
SaaS. No CAPEX
Country-packs ready
Light, API-first
Fast configuration
Small team, guided support

Compare us

Global Vendors

Enterprise projects that require integrators, multi-layer architecture, long scoping phases.

CLP Hub

Go-live in 2–4 months thanks to modular architecture, ready-made insurance logic, and API-first design.

Benefit:

Faster ROI + ability to test markets without long commitments.

Global Vendors

High licensing fees, integration partners, long customization cycles.

CLP Hub

Predictable SaaS pricing, transparent TCO, no CAPEX, minimal integration overhead.

Benefit:

Perfect match for Tier-2/3 insurers, brokers, MGAs and banks.

Global Vendors

Often lack ready adaptation for small or emerging markets.

CLP Hub

Country-packs: language, currency, regulatory flows, data residency.

Benefit:

Launch without heavy consulting or custom development.

Global Vendors

New products require long cycles and involvement of integrators.

CLP Hub

Configure products and workflows within the platform — launch new lines fast.

Final Takeaway

CLP Hub offers 70–80% functionality of enterprise PAS/Billing/Claims platforms but delivers it faster, cheaper, and with a flexible partnership model.